On the night of October 8, 2026, Alex Bagada, the Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions and the official heading Uganda’s Homicide Division, stepped into a sauna in the Bugolobi neighbourhood of Kampala. By the early hours of the following morning, Uganda’s Independence Day, he was found lying unconscious in a bush near Lubiri Secondary School in Wakaliga, stripped of his mobile phones, his personal belongings, and reportedly more than Shs129 million from his bank account. The woman believed to be at the centre of this chain of events has not been found.
The case, first reported by Chimpreports, has sent shockwaves through Uganda’s legal and law enforcement circles, raising uncomfortable questions about personal security, the audacity of organised criminal networks, and the vulnerabilities that even senior officials can face when they let their guard down.

A Routine Evening That Became Anything But
Bagada’s night started simply enough. A sauna visit in Bugolobi is not unusual for Kampala’s professional class. The neighbourhood is home to bars, restaurants, and leisure spots frequented by the city’s well-heeled residents. At some point during his time at the sauna, Bagada reportedly struck up a conversation with an unidentified woman. What followed was the kind of social progression that happens in cities everywhere: acquaintances become companions, a sauna session turns into an invitation for drinks.
The two reportedly made their way to Alchemist Bar, also in Bugolobi, a popular Kampala watering hole. Bagada left his vehicle, registered as UBK 031D, in the bar’s parking area and got into the woman’s car. That decision, sources close to the investigation suggest, is roughly where Bagada’s memory of the night ends. The working theory among investigators is that he was drugged at some point during the evening, rendering him incapacitated and completely at the mercy of whoever was with him.
Found in a Bush on Independence Day Morning
When passersby encountered a man lying motionless in a bush near Lubiri Secondary School in Wakaliga during the early hours of October 9, their first assumption was grim. They feared they had stumbled upon a body. Police were alerted, and officers who responded to the scene found that Bagada was, in fact, alive, though deeply unconscious. He was rushed to Mulago Hospital for emergency treatment.
The location itself tells a story. Wakaliga is several kilometres from Bugolobi, suggesting that whoever dropped the prosecutor there wanted him far from the scene of the original encounter. It is the kind of calculated detail that speaks to premeditation rather than opportunism.
The Financial Damage: Shs129 Million Gone
As Bagada recovered, the full scale of what had happened began to crystallise. Beyond the physical ordeal, his bank account had reportedly been drained of approximately Shs129 million. His mobile phones, which would have contained banking apps, contact information, and potentially sensitive work-related data, were also missing.
For context, Shs129 million is a significant sum by any standard in Uganda. The loss points to a sophisticated operation. Drugging a victim, accessing their phones, bypassing banking security measures, and withdrawing or transferring large sums before the person regains consciousness requires either inside knowledge, technical capability, or both. This was not a street mugging.
The Hunt for the Mystery Woman
Police are now actively working to trace the unidentified woman who met Bagada at the sauna. Her identity remains unknown, and her whereabouts are unclear. Investigators from the Criminal Investigations Directorate are believed to be pursuing forensic leads, reviewing surveillance footage from the sauna, Alchemist Bar, and surrounding areas, and cross-referencing any available digital evidence.
The fact that Bagada heads the Homicide Division adds a layer of institutional sensitivity to the case. His office routinely handles the most serious criminal matters in Uganda’s prosecutorial system. The idea that a senior figure in that position could be targeted so successfully will not sit comfortably within the corridors of the Directorate of Public Prosecutions.
A Pattern That Kampala Knows Too Well
Kampala has seen cases like this before, though rarely involving someone of Bagada’s professional standing. The method, meeting a target socially, building brief but convincing rapport, administering a sedative through a drink, and then systematically looting the victim’s finances, follows a script that criminal networks on the continent have refined over years. Victims are often reluctant to report out of embarrassment, which is precisely what makes the scheme so effective and so persistent.
The fact that this case has become public, given who the victim is, may actually work in the investigation’s favour. High-profile cases attract resources, political pressure, and inter-agency cooperation that quieter cases do not. Whether that translates into an arrest remains to be seen.
What This Means Beyond One Night
There is a broader conversation embedded in this story. Personal security in urban East Africa is a subject that rarely gets the serious treatment it deserves until something dramatic forces the issue. Professionals, executives, and public officials routinely let their guard down in social settings, and criminal networks know this. The sauna, the bar, the friendly stranger: these are not random elements. They are the architecture of a trap designed to feel entirely normal right up until it is not.
Bagada’s case is a sharp reminder that no professional title, no level of legal expertise, and no amount of institutional authority makes a person immune to well-orchestrated criminal schemes. The man who prosecutes Uganda’s most serious crimes found himself, on Uganda’s Independence Day morning, helpless in a bush.
Police have yet to announce any arrests. The investigation is ongoing, and the woman at the centre of it all remains unaccounted for. Kampala is watching, and so is everyone paying attention to crime, security, and accountability in Uganda’s public sector.
What does it take for personal security to be treated as seriously as professional responsibility, and why does it so often require a scandal of this scale before the conversation even begins?

